CEO respondents named the CEO at 84 percent. Finance respondents named the CFO at 61 percent. Technology respondents named the CIO or CTO ahead of every other seat. Every operating seat named itself the signer more often than any other seat named it. We call it the Self-Attribution Effect.
Two outside views break the tie. Investors, looking across whole portfolios with no chair in the fight, put the CEO at 51 percent. The network-wide operator average puts the CEO at 44 percent. So the CEO's lead is real, and it is also smaller than the CEO believes.
The finding is funny until you sit in a budget meeting. If three seats each believe they hold the pen, the AI purchase process is contested even as it consolidates, and the contest explains some of what we see elsewhere in the data: the doubling of unowned decisions, the rise of finance as the fastest-growing sign-off seat, and the seller-side report that the pitch increasingly runs through two doors before it closes.
Ask your own team the question this week. If the answers disagree, the August data says you have company.
Full numbers: CEO AI Leverage Report and Executive AI Leverage Report, August 2026.
Last updated: August 3, 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Ask Your Team the Question
The CEO and Executive AI Leverage Reports, August 2026, carry the full seat-by-seat tables. If your team's answers disagree, the data says you have company.